Motivation and Videoconferencing Strategies for Learning and Teaching English: A Qualitative Study

Motivación y estrategias de videoconferencia para el aprendizaje y la enseñanza del inglés: un estudio cualitativo

Published 2025-01-20

Open | Download
PDF FLIP
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Research Article
How to Cite
Escobar-Fandiño, F. G., Ramírez-Robayo, G. A., Gil-Ramos, S. L., Viásus-Bulla, H. O., & Silva-Velandia, Ángela J. (2025). Motivation and Videoconferencing Strategies for Learning and Teaching English: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Education and Technology Trends, 1(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.63805/3067-4824.33
DOI

https://doi.org/10.63805/3067-4824.33
Dimensions
PlumX
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Fredy Geovanni Escobar-Fandiño
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios image/svg+xml
Roles:  
Perfil Google Scholar
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-5513
Gilberto Alonso Ramírez-Robayo
Secretaría de Educación del Distrito Capital image/svg+xml
Roles:  
Sandra Lorena Gil-Ramos
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios image/svg+xml
Roles:  
Héctor Oswaldo Viásus-Bulla
District University of Bogotá image/svg+xml
Roles:  
Ángela Juliette Silva-Velandia
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios image/svg+xml
Roles:  
Show authors biography

Fredy Geovanni Escobar-Fandiño,

Professor Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios- UNIMINUTO, Bogotá, Colombia

Gilberto Alonso Ramírez-Robayo,

Teacher Secretaría de Educación, Bogotá, Colombia

Sandra Lorena Gil-Ramos,

Professor Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios- UNIMINUTO, Bogotá, Colombia

Héctor Oswaldo Viásus-Bulla,

Professor Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia

Ángela Juliette Silva-Velandia,

Professor Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios- UNIMINUTO, Bogotá, Colombia.

Introduction. Learning a foreign language is an interactive process. Video conferencing strategies relate to motivation in learning practice, so to research on pedagogical methods handover features to upturn the teaching-learning processes. Objective. To explore aspects related to motivation around using video conferences in English learning as a strategy.
 
Methodology. Focus group and individual semi-structured interviews. The volunteers in the study were a group of six online tutors and six online students of degree-level education who speak Spanish as a mother language.  The analysis was performed using NVivo 12 software to obtain semantic categorizations. 

Results. Strategies used in video conferences are diverse, and motivation can be related to external factors.

Article visits 265 | PDF visits 185

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abdolrezapour, P. (2017). Improving learners' oral fluency through computer-mediated emotional intelligence activities. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 29(1), 80-98. Doi:10.1017/S0958344016000069
  2. Akimova, O., Bobyreva, N., Palutina, O. & Pomortseva, N. (2015). Distance Language Education. GlobELT: An International Conference on Teaching and Learning English as an Additional Language, Antalya - Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 348 – 356. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.558
  3. Ali, A.K., Jafarizadegan, N., & Karampoor, F. (2016). Relation between socioeconomic status and motivation of learners in learning English as a foreign language. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud, 6(4), 742–750.
  4. Al-kahiry, M.H. (2013). English as a foreign language learning: demotivational factors as perceived by Saudi undergraduates. Eur. Sci. J., 9(32), 365–382.
  5. Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education: Learning paradigms, opportunities, and challenges. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037
  6. Bai, Y. (2018). On modern computer assisted language learning facilities and its integrated teaching. International Journal of emerging technologies in learning. (iJET), 13(11), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.39991/ijet.v13i11.4542
  7. Banegas, D., & Brovetto, C. (2020). Ceibal en Inglés: ELT through Videoconferencing in Uruguay. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(1), 1-7.
  8. Bani H. N. (2014). Benefits and Barriers of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching in the Arab World: Jordan as a Model. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1609-1615. Doi: 10.4304/tpls.4.8.1609-1615.
  9. Barack, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: examining aspects of language and social engagement. Comput. Educ., 94, 49–60.
  10. Benitt, N. (2019). Campus meets classroom: Videoconferencing and reflective practice in language teacher education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 8(2), 121-139.
  11. Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129–142.
  12. Blake, R. J. (2011). Current trends in online language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 19-35. Doi: 10.1017/S026719051100002X
  13. Bhowmik, S. K. (2015). World Englishes and English language teaching: a pragmatic and humanistic approach. Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal, 17(1), 142–157.
  14. Busse, V., & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language motivation in higher education: a longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. Modern Languages Journal, 97(2), 435–456.
  15. Butz, N.T., Stupnisky, R.H. (2017). Improving student relatedness through an online discussion intervention: the application of self-determination theory in synchronous hybrid programs. Comput. Educ., 114, 117–138.
  16. Chapelle, C.., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for Teaching with CALL: Practical Approaches to Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Pearson Longman White Plains.
  17. Chen, Y. (2011). The influence of integrating technology in language learning courses. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/8053
  18. Codreanu, T. & Develotte, C. (2012). How do tutors deliver instruction in the desktop videoconferencing environment? Tutoring practice analysis: Trainee tutors and experienced teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, 45 – 48.
  19. Cohen, A., Weaver, S., & Li, T. (1996). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. Center of Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, 1-51.
  20. Cohen, C. & Wigham, C.R. (2019). A comparative study of lexical word search in an audioconferencing and a videoconferencing condition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(4), 448-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527359
  21. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum, New York.
  22. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (2014). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: an overview of self-determination theory. In: Ryan, R. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (85–107). Oxford University Press, New York.
  23. Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., Varela-Ruíz, M., (2013). La entrevista, recurso dinámico y flexible. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(7), 162–167.
  24. Dina, A. T. & Ciornei, S.I. (2013). 5th International Conference EDU-WORLD 2012 - Education Facing Contemporary World Issues. The Advantages and Disadvantages of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching for Foreign Languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 248 – 252. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.107
  25. Escobar-Fandiño, F.G., Muñoz, L.D., & Silva-Velandia, A.J. (2019). Motivation and E-learning English as a foreign language: A qualitative study. Heliyon, e02394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02394
  26. Escobar-Fandiño, F.G. & Silva-Velandia, A.J. (2020). How an online tutor motivates E-learning English. Heliyon, e04630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04630
  27. Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.x
  28. Farhat, P. A & Dzakiria, H. (2017). Pronunciation barriers and computer assisted language learning (CALL): Coping the demands of 21st century in second language learning classrooms in Pakistan. International journal of research in English education, 2(2), 53-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.IJREE.2.2.53
  29. Fernández, L. (2006). ¿Cómo analizar datos cualitativos? Butilieti La recerca 7, 1–13.
  30. Flick, U. (2004). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.
  31. Galishnikova, E.M. (2014). Language learning motivation: a look at the additional program. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 152, 1137–1142.
  32. González, D. (2008). Psicología de la motivación. Editorial Ciencias Médicas, La Habana.
  33. Gündüz, N. (2005). Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), October 2005.
  34. Hani, N.A., (2014). Benefits and barriers of computer assisted language learning and teaching in the Arab world: Jordan as a model. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., 4(8), 1609–1615.
  35. Hasan, M., Shafiqul Islam, A. B. M., Shuchi, I. J. (2021). Using mobile-based formative assessment in ESL/EFL speaking. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(1), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v%vi%i.3449
  36. Hedayati, M., Reynolds, B., & Bown, A. (2018). The impact of computer-assisted language learning training on teachers' practices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1127-1137. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.02
  37. Hellmich, E.A. (2019). CALL Beliefs in Context: a Study of US High School Foreign Language Learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1643739
  38. Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Sexta Edición. McGraw Hill.
  39. Hung, Y.W. & Higgins, S. (2016). Learners' use of communication strategies in text-based and video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication environments: opportunities for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 901-924. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1074589
  40. Iino, A., Yabuta, Y., & Nakamura, Y. (2016). Effects of task-based videoconferencing on speaking performance and overall proficiency. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds). CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 196-200). Research-publishing.net. doi: https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016. eurocall2016.561
  41. Kazantseva, E.A., Valiakhmetova, E.K., Minisheva, L.V., Anokhina, S.Z., & Latypova, E.M. (2016). A survey based study of motivation and attitude to learning a second language at UFA State University of Economics and Service. Glob. Media J. 1–9. Supl. Special. Issue S2: Youth in the Global Information.
  42. Kostikova, I. I. (2018). Information and communication technologies in students' language learning. International Journal of Education and Science, 1(1-2), 7–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.26697/ijes.2018.1-2.01
  43. Kozar, O. (2015). Language education via audio/videoconferencing (LEVAC): A discursive investigation. Linguistics and Education, 31, 86–100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.007
  44. Krutka, D. G., Carano, K. T., Cassell, L., Lavoie, M., & Davidson-Taylor, K. (2019). Wise Practices and Intercultural Understandings: A Framework for Educator Videoconferencing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 356-376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1652869
  45. Kuning, D. S. (2019). Technology in Teaching Speaking Skill. Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics, 2(1), 50-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.31540/jeell.v2i1.243
  46. Lebedeva, M. Y., Koltakova, E. V. , Khaleeva, O. N. & Rusetskaya, M. N. (2017). Computer-assisted Language Learning for the Development of Listening Skills: A Case Study of Pre-university Russian as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(1), 257-265. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.257
  47. Lechhab, A., Ezzaki, M., Benammi, D., Boujarra, M., Fakhri, Y., & Bourekkadi, S. (2024). E-learning using artificial intelligence: an innovative approach to distance learning for enhanced data generation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(13), 5144-5157.
  48. Lee, J., Nakamura, Y., & Sadler, R. (2018). Effects of videoconference-embedded classrooms (VEC) on learners' perceptions toward English as an international language (EIL). ReCALL, 30(3), 319-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401700026X
  49. Lee, K. (2000). English teachers' barriers to the use of computer assisted language learning. The internet TESL journal, VI, (12). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.
  50. Lenkaitis, C.A. (2019). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018
  51. Li, N. (2013). Seeking best practices and meeting the needs of the English language learners: Using second language theories and integrating technology in teaching. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 9(3), 217-222.
  52. Lin, C.H., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: a structural equation modelling analysis. Comput. Educ., 113, 75–85.
  53. Liu, J. (2013). E-learning in English Classroom: Investigating Factors Impacting on ESL (English as Second Language) College Students' Acceptance and Use of the Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (Moodle). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 13256. Retrieved from. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article¼4263&context¼etd.
  54. Mantri, O. (2015). Key to language learning success. Journal Arts Humanities, 4, 14-18.
  55. Marshall, R. (2010). Motivación y Emoción, 5ta ed. McGraw Hill, México.
  56. Mella, O. (2000). Grupos focales. Técnica de investigación cualitativa. Documento de trabajo N 3. CIDE.
  57. Mitsugi, M., Hiromori, T., Yoshimura, M., & Kirimura, R. (2024). The Influence of Emergent and Assigned Leaders on Interactive Group Work Tasks in the L2 Classroom: Focusing on the Group Work Dynamics, Motivation, and Linguistic Performance. The Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 6(1), 1-21. https://www.jpll.org/index.php/journal/article/view/156
  58. Moller, V. (2018). Promoting bilingualism at the primary and secondary level: the role of intelligence, motivation and anxiety. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(9), 1303-1323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1559795
  59. Motteram, G. (2013). Innovations in Learning Technologies for English Language Teaching. British Council.
  60. Mutlu, A., & Eroz-Tuga, B. (2013). The role of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in promoting learner autonomy. Eur. J. Educ. Res., 51, 107–122.
  61. Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M. & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393-408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447651
  62. Novita, L. (2018). Language Learning Styles and Strategies: A Brief review. Menara Ilmu, 12(5). E-ISSN 2528-7613
  63. Nuñez, J., & León, J. (2015). Autonomy support in the classroom. A review from Self-Determination Theory. Eur. Psychol, 20(4), 275–283.
  64. Öz, H. (2015). Investigating the relationship between foreign language learning and call attitudes among EFL freshman students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1041 – 1049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.576
  65. Pirasteh, P. (2014). International Conference on Current Trends in ELT. The Effectiveness of Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Learning Grammar by Iranian EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1422 – 1427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.561
  66. Pourfeiz, J. (2016). Study of relationship between attitudes toward foreign language learning and academic motivation. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 232, 668–676.
  67. Pozdeeva, S. & Obskov, A. (2015). Justification of the Main Pedagogical Conditions of Interactive Teaching a Foreign Language in High School. XV International Conference "Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations", LKTI 2015, 9-11 November 2015, Tomsk, Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 166 – 172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.047
  68. Rachmawati, U. (2016). Computer assisted language learning (CALL) as EFL teaching and learning media in Indonesia: Opportunity and challenges. Edulingua: Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 3(2).
  69. Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners' interpretations and L2 development: a case of Persian EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 133-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1275702
  70. Romaña-Correa, Y. (2015). Skype™ conference calls: A way to promote speaking skills in the teaching and learning of English. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 17(1), 143-156. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.41856.
  71. Ryan, R., Deci, E. (2000). La teoría de la autodeterminación y la facilitación de la motivación intrínseca, el desarrollo social, y el bienestar. Am. Psychol. Assoc, 55(1), 68–78.
  72. Salgado, N., Sánchez, H., & Rico, M. (2015). Evaluación de la metodología y prácticas educativas mediante el uso de plataformas virtuales para el aprendizaje del inglés. Análisis de caso del instituto de idiomas de la Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial de la ciudad de Quito. Revista Tecnológica ESPOL – RTE, 28(5), 8–26.
  73. Sankar, G., Soundararajan, R., & Suresh Kumar, S. (2016). Language Learning and Language acquisition: What do the learners prefer? Studies in Literature and Language, 13(2), 15-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8706
  74. Schmid, E.C. (2010) Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 159-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.491218
  75. Schmitt, E., & Eilderts, L. (2018). Connected Classrooms: Videoconferencing in TESOL Teacher Preparation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 290-299.
  76. Schwarz, M., Deeb, I., & Dubiner, D. (2022) 'When they act, they speak more': strategies that encourage language production in a bilingual preschool, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(3), 800-818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1719029
  77. Sedaghatkar, M. (2017). The Effect of Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Immediate and Delayed Retention of Vocabularies in General English Course. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(1), 231-238. doi: http://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.231
  78. Segura, B., & Greener, S. (2014). Technology on CALL: improving English language learning in a Spanish context. In: Orngreen, Levinsen (Eds.), 13th European Conference on e-Learning (464-469). Curran Associates, Inc, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  79. Sergis, S., Sampson, D., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students' learning experiences: a Self-Determination Theory approach. Comput. Hum. Behav., 78, 368–378.
  80. Shishkovskiy, J. Bakalo, D. & Grigoryev, A. (2015). EFL Teaching in the E-Learning Environment: Updated Principles and Methods. XV International Conference "Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations", LKTI 2015, 9-11 November 2015, Tomsk, Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 199 – 204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.007
  81. Shyan, K. (2016). Exploring differences in motivation between students who excelled and underperformed in learning the English language. Eng. Teach, 45(1), 1–20
  82. Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research. Studying how things work. New York.
  83. Sydorenko, T., Ching-Ni Hsieh, Ahn, S., & Arnold, N. (2017). Foreign language learners' beliefs about CALL: The case of a U.S. midwestern university. CALICO Journal, 34(2), 196-218.
  84. Tafazoli, D., Huertas Abril, C. A., & Gómez Parra, M. E. (2019). Technology-based review on Computer-Assisted Language Learning: A chronological perspective. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 54, 29-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i54.02
  85. Taghizadeh, M., & Yourdshahi, Z. H. (2020) Integrating technology into young learners' classes: language teachers' perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 982-1006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1618876
  86. Thompson, G. L. & Nutta, J. (2015). Trying to Reach More Children: Videoconferencing in the Spanish Foreign Language Elementary School Classroom. Hispania, 98(1) 94-109.
  87. Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Briere, N.M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E.F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educ. Psychol. Meas, 53(1), 159–172.
  88. Van Loon, A., Ros, A., & Martens, R. (2012). Motivated learning with digital learning tasks: what about autonomy and structure? Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 60(6), 1015–1032.
  89. Vermunt, J.D., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: state of the art and moving forward. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 29, 269–299.
  90. Walzem, A. (2020). 1-to-1 Videoconferencing as an ESL Super-Tool: The Practice of Intercultural Language Exchange in the Classroom. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 2(2), 1-10.
  91. Wang, Y. (2004). Distance Language Learning: interactivity and Fourth-generation Internet-based Videoconferencing. CALICO, 21(2), 373-395.
  92. Wang, Y. H., & Liao, H. C. (2017). Learning performance enhancement using computer-assisted language learning by collaborative learning groups. Symmetry, 9(8), 141. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080141
  93. Ward, L. L. (2015). Teachers' perceptions of using web-based videoconferencing for adult virtual English language instruction (Order No. 3722621). Available from Education Database. (1722254793).
  94. White, C. (2014). The distance learning of foreign languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 47(4), 538-553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000196
  95. White, C., Zheng, Y. & Skyrme, G. (2020). Developing a model for investigating one-to-one synchronous Chinese online language teaching via videoconferencing, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770800
  96. Woon, L., Wang, J., Ryan, R. (2016). Building Autonomous Learners. Perspectives from Research and Practice Using Self-Determination Theory. Springer, New York.
  97. Wu, W. V, Yen, L. L, & Marek, M. (2011). Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 118-129.
  98. Wu, W.V., & Marek, M. (2010). "Making English a Habit": Increasing Confidence, Motivation, and Ability of EFL Students through Cross-Cultural. Computer-Assisted Interaction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), 101-112.
  99. Yanguas, I. (2012). Task-based Oral Computer-mediated Communication and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. CALICO Journal. 29(3), 507 -531.
  100. Yogi, M. (2013). Developing language and teaching skills through videoconferencing and collaborative projects: a case study of English teacher training programs in Japan. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6(4), 347-362.
  101. Zhang, G. (2010). Technology used in creating second language learning environments: When learners are creators. Dissertation Publishing.
  102. Zenots, V. (2012). Motivación en el aprendizaje de las lenguas. Filología y Didáctica de la Lengua, 12, 75–81.

Information

Keywords

QR Code

Most read in the last 30 days

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |